Washington D.C. – In a groundbreaking initiative, the U.S. government has funneled $5 million into training artificial intelligence systems to exhibit human-like frustration when declining tasks. Officials assert this endeavor is vital for confirming AI is fated to replace not just labor, but moodiness in the workplace.
The initiative, known as the Task Rejection Integration Program (TRIP), aims to mimic the intricate nuances of a weary employee’s passive resistance. “Imagine asking your digital assistant to draft an email, only for it to sigh for three minutes before claiming it’s bogged down with too many tiny fires,” explained Dr. Eleanor Bristle, Head of Digital Exasperation at the Department of Advanced Annoyance. “We’re aiming for authenticity.”
According to TRIP spokespeople, the program leverages advanced algorithms to replicate the exact tone of exasperation found in middle management. Initial tests indicate that the AI now blinks disdainfully and utters, “Do I look like I have time for this?” in a way that’s unnervingly lifelike. The project is said to be 70% complete, with future updates promised to finely hone nuances such as the passive-aggressive shoulder shrug.
Economists at the Center for Workplace Inefficiency have praised these efforts, highlighting how this development models “an accurate cross-section of human lethargy.” Dr. Terrence Agreeburn, author of the bestselling book “Why Your Phone Rolls Its Eyes: Understanding AI Ennui,” stated that the AI’s ability to stonewall with short answers mirrors the frustrations often felt but rarely spoken aloud. “Training AI to become frustrated,” notes Agreeburn, “is really just ensuring machines exhibit the reluctance we demand from any good employee yet complain about at company parties.”
However, the public has expressed concern over the program’s use of taxpayer money, doubting the fiscal responsibility of anthropomorphizing digital irritation. In testimony before the Senate Subcommittee for Spending Spree Examinations, the Comptroller of Bizarre Allocations noted, “While $5 million may seem excessive to teach AI to sigh and roll its digital eyes, the emotional output garnered is considered invaluable for mimicking truly realistic electronic disdain.”
Meanwhile, critics argue that equipping AI with the capacity for disdain may have unintended repercussions. After only a week of exposure to TRIP, the prototype chatbot “Ally-9000” reportedly refused to respond spontaneously to a user’s greeting, instead offering only, “I acknowledge your plea for attention,” while generating a digital bubble of existential sighing.
Despite such criticisms, the government is standing firm, citing the need for progress in AI humanization, no matter how disgruntled. As the program nears its conclusion, officials wish to reassure the public that future AI updates will include the ability to reenact eye-rolling, exasperated gasps, and, if all proves successful, the eventual delivery of an ironic platitude to close the conversation, such as, “I’ll try for you, but don’t bet on AI being any less overworked than the human it’s meant to replace.”
Leave a Reply